Nevertheless,
Book: laure murat attacks moral:
Book
Laure Murat attacks the “recovery” of classic texts
Installed in the USA. Furthermore, the academic denounces the smoothing made in the name of the politically correct. However, You have to know how to identify the enemy.
Laure Murat, to whom there are already a number of significant tests.
Photo provided by Verdier editions.
It’s very small. Therefore, The book holds for once in the pocket. Similarly, Compared to “Who cancels what?”, Published in 2022 on a related subject, Laure Murat nevertheless doubled the dose. Therefore, Or almost. Therefore, “All eras are disgusting” book: laure murat attacks moral has 80 pages, and no longer 48. In addition, It must be said that the subject supposed more complex developments. However, This time it is no longer a question of unclogging the statues. For example, as we knew at the time of Black Lives Matter, but the modification for moral reasons of the classic texts. Moreover, Large or small. Meanwhile, For some (and therefore some), all written should comply with the current standards in terms of thinking with large plans. Meanwhile, Nothing should no longer shock the time of “micro-aggressions”. Additionally, Meanwhile, Suspected sexism, racism or colonialism, at the risk of stripping according to Laure Murat the oppressive of their traumatic history.
Deletions and transformations
The author starts from simple cases, all from the Anglo-Saxon world. Nevertheless, Normal! Therefore, This rebellious girl (yes, there are still any!) Has been teaching for book: laure murat attacks moral a good decade at the UCLA in Los Angeles. However, A city whose libertarian charms she praised in “This is not a city” in 2016. Nevertheless, Suffice to say that it crossed out in a academic cauldron where it is only a question of gender. Therefore, class, inequality and race. Nevertheless, Much more than literature. However, Laure Murat therefore sits in the epicenter of a culture that should be constantly up to date by deletions (or censorship. Moreover, if you prefer) or transformations. In addition, It is no longer a question here of putting Rabelais. However, Montaigne in modern French to make it accessible to readers of 2025, but of granting them to modern “sensitivity”. Therefore, A universe that should become benevolent for everyone, and of course also for all. Consequently, Hence emasculations. Meanwhile, We do not make an omelet without breaking eggs by attacking James Bond. In addition, Agatha book: laure murat attacks moral Christie or the “Huckleberry Finn” by Mark Twain where it is a question of “Negers” (the big word prohibits today) in almost all the sentences.
“Do you judge James Bond Sexiste, Agatha Christie Raciste and Ododged?” Well stop reading them, as well as those who perpetuate stereotypes. Move on ”.
For Laure Murat, there is however a simple remedy for those who would feel shaken. “Do you judge James Bond Sexiste, Agatha Christie Raciste and Ododged?” Well stop reading them, as well as those who perpetuate stereotypes. Move on ”. There is therefore no need for “rewriting”. One thing that the academic clearly distinguishes from “rewriting”. Nothing common in fact between root borrowing Phèdre from Euripides. Seneca and the smoothing hackers Roald Dahl (1) in order to “protect childhood”. But what, by the way? Laure incorrects that book: laure murat attacks moral these trafficking are actually big money. It is a question of not losing an audience who has, or would have evolved. Agatha Christie still represents a lot of money. Four million copies of its thrillers are sold each year, not to mention adaptations to cinema or television. Let her become an “offensive” woman would amount to killing the hen with golden eggs. That said. and there Laure Murat leaves an open door to the future, “the next century will experience a malicious pleasure in flushing out our current blindness”. Until trend reversal? I doubt it.
Book: laure murat attacks moral
State censorship
For the author. who bathes in a liberalism rather located on the left, the main danger, however, comes at the moment. She who hesitates in the face of talking about “censorship” about “wokism” (2) attacks the way in which the. book: laure murat attacks moral state brings books out of the books. “In 2022, the requests for censorship concerned 2571 titles, an increase of 38 percent compared to the past year. In 2023, the number of requests amounted to 4,240 titles in public libraries and schools. There is no doubt that 2025 will break all records. ” A little reminder that “all the eras are disgusting” already forms at the time of its release a historical work. The pamphlet was written between the US elections of 2024 and the inauguration of Donald Trump on January 20. It was not planned six months ago that American universities would take such a slap. I am thinking in particular of Harvard, who had risen the neck so far. By dint of overtaking a lot (in a way that is not always sympathetic. by the way), his head now seems good to cut. Laure has also spoken since returning book: laure murat attacks moral to France, a country formerly dedicated to her personal gemonies.
“In 2022, the requests for censorship concerned 2571 titles, an increase of 38 percent compared to the past year. In 2023, the number of requests amounted to 4,240 titles in public libraries and schools. ”
Well thought out. written in a simple and legible way, “all the eras are disgusting” (the reference is borrowed from Antonin Artaud, which is very chic) constitutes the peak of “who cancels what?”. No. Yes. All in all. The thing is due to the nature of the objects. In principle, a book has nothing unique. Caviard does not remove the existence of the original edition. A little in the same way that a bad cinematographic adaptation does not cancel the paper version. With the statues thrown down, it is not the same book: laure murat attacks moral thing. They constitute both a symbol and a work. The artistic quality can be diverse, I concede it. The room is nonetheless unique. Hence vandalism, this word invented by Father Grégoire in 1794. Laure Murat said he was favorable in her new text to the displacement of things, and not to their destruction. Some sculptures would leave public space for the museum. The best would be exposed to it for their sole appearance. This is the solution I would have proposed for the David de Pury de Neuchâtel. if it had been necessary. Death for a long time the man has been like many people of his time financially linked to slavery. Bronze is also a masterpiece of the sculptor David d’Angers. Finally, as you know, there was HAPPY END. Building in the field. Not all eras are entirely disgusting.
N.-B. I have long book: laure murat attacks moral wondered how I knew Laure Murat. The light ended up coming to me, as if I was a shepherd in Fatima. In another life, the woman was a journalist at “Beaux-Arts Magazine” and wrote in “the object of art”. It therefore remains sensitive to the materiality of the works.
(1) Laure Murat insists a lot on Roald Dahl, the author of “Charlie and the Chocolate factory” in 1964. The thing denotes the English anchor of her book.
(2) Laure is thus at the antipodes of her elder Nathalie Heinich.
Book: laure murat attacks moral
Practical
“All the eras are disgusting” by Laure Murat, at Verdier editions, 80 pages.
Did you find an error? Please report it to us.
Further reading: Emma Becker: “I deplore the gradual disappearance of unifying eroticism” – The 6 favorite books of the writer David Lelait Helo for the week of June 28, 2025 – This summer, why not a Belgian book in your suitcase? – The top 10 best sales in bookstores the procure – Mistamorphosed and full of promises – the press of Tunisia.
