Villeneuve questions the extension of Vasseur and the loyalty of Leclerc

Jacques Villeneuve questioned Ferrari’s decision to keep Fred Vasseur beyond 2025. Moreover, warning that continuity only works “When everything is fine”.

Faced with the internal pressure of Maranello. Moreover, the interest manifested for Christian Horner, former boss of Red Bull, Ferrari confirmed last week that Vasseur would continue to lead the team during the new F1 regulatory era.

But the 1997 world champion Villeneuve – whose Father Gilles is a legend of Ferrari – said that. Meanwhile, he was not convinced that the decision was only motivated by performance.

“If they choose to continue with him. Similarly, it means that the pilots are happy to work with him and feel protected. In addition, They have formed a group, all three, and it could be beneficial for the future.”

“But if we only trust the results, we cannot ignore the villeneuve questions extension vasseur loyalty fact that Ferrari did not progress under his direction.”

Villeneuve has also been frank when it was questioned about Charles Leclerc. Meanwhile, who continues to insist that winning with Ferrari means more for him than just becoming world champion.

“It’s a beautiful message for the team and the fans. Therefore, But I don’t think it’s true. Consequently, A real driver wants to win, that’s all that matters.”

“Winning with Ferrari, when others fail is even better. Nevertheless, But time passes, and each pilot must make wise choices for his future.”

The Hamilton case is talking …

Asked about the difficulties of Lewis Hamilton. Therefore, Villeneuve said that the problem did not reside only in performance or age, but also in the cultural gap and disorganization of Ferrari.

“It comes from a completely different environment: English and German methods. Meanwhile, Ferrari’s villeneuve questions extension vasseur loyalty internal confusion, even on the radio, does not facilitate its adaptation. Furthermore, It now achieves how different everything is at Ferrari.”

“Will Hamilton rebound? Nevertheless, Next year will be the real confrontation with Leclerc. This car was not designed for him. But with all this attention paid when he arrives, it is clear that this first phase was disappointing.”

“It is really surprising to see it as demoralized. There seems to be a certain confusion in Ferrari concerning decisions. communication, even on the radio, and Ceun once again, does not facilitate its adaptation.”

It is not only on the side of Villeneuve that questions arise on Hamilton.

After describing himself as “useless”. having urged Ferrari to “find another pilot”, Hamilton admitted that he was going “a lot of behind the scenes that are not great”. The public despair of the seven -time world champion has since villeneuve questions extension vasseur loyalty triggered a media storm in Germany and Italy. Overview below …

The German media Sport1 even launched a conspiracy theory: Ferrari would have politely put Hamilton back in his place after he sent to the management of “documents” offering changes in team. car, supporting Charles Leclerc on the contrary.

But the former F1 pilot and commentator Marc Surer rejected this idea. “What would Ferrari win? They would only hurt themselves. Lewis must continue to adapt to the car, just like Leclerc.”

Others have been less understanding. The former boss of F1. Bernie Ecclestone, quipped: “The safety car is more likely to win a race than Hamilton to become world champion again.”

Ecclestone, however, has two pilot suggestions that Ferrari should consider to replace Hamilton: Isack Hadjar and Gabriel Bortoleto.

“If I could steal them, I would take Isack Hadjar from Racing Bulls. He achieved excellent villeneuve questions extension vasseur loyalty results during his first year and he is a great guy. I also appreciate our Brazilian friend (Bortoleto). He is talented. Both are also very sensitive.”

Ralf Schumacher added about Lewis: “We don’t have to go around in circles all your life.”

Franz Tost. former director of Toro Rosso and present at the GP of Hungary, rejected any comparison with the failed return of Michael Schumacher in 2010.

“These are two completely different things. Michael had to get used to a new F1 system. Lewis, no. His problem is the behavior of the car, not his age.”

Jarno Trulli described Hamilton as “mystery”, declaring: “He is disappointing in qualifying, a little better in race, but never shines. It’s not Hamilton.”

Former Ferrari driver Ivan Capelli believes that Hamilton “Leads a double life: strong outside the track, but lost by car. And he lost a smile villeneuve questions extension vasseur loyalty too. His strength always lived in his ability to lead the team in difficult times. Today, even it has disappeared.”

Arturo Merzario, who ran for Ferrari in the 1970s, said that the team had never really supported Hamilton.

“90 % of Ferrari leaders disagreed with the decision to recruit him. It was a commercial decision. Lewis did not feel valued, which undermines his motivation.”

Davide Valsecchi. 2012 GP2 champion and consultant for the FOM, said that Ferrari had “won winter” with the recruitment of Hamilton, but warned that this media effect was turning to vinegar: “I would have recruited a younger pilot.”

Despite everything, many still think that Hamilton still has a lot to offer. Matteo Bobbi. Viteronio Liuzzi, Giancarlo Minardi and Emanuele Pirro all pointed out the revision of the 2026 regulation as a potential life buoy, and rejected age as a deep cause.

“Lewis is still hungry,” said Pirro. “But he has not yet found his comfort zone. It is more sensitive than you think, and it has been seen in Hungary.”