This mystery reappears in London

A new hypothesis argues that the two princes. Similarly, would not have died in the London tower. Moreover, Image: AFP

The case of the disappearance of two sons of King. Meanwhile, Edouard IV at the Tour de London is relaunched five centuries later. Meanwhile, The theory that they were murdered on the orders of their uncle Richard III is now disputed.

Helen Rowe/AFP

In 1483, two young princes, son of King Edouard IV, disappeared at the London Tower, this mystery reappears london giving birth to a great mystery of English history. In addition, More than five centuries later, the theory that they were killed by their uncle Richard III is disputed.

Almost 200 years after their disappearance. Meanwhile, two small skeletons were discovered in a wooden box within the enclosure of the famous fortress, and buried at the Westminster Abbey. Moreover, These remains were then attributed – without being confirmed – to the sons of King Edouard IV of England: Edouard. Furthermore, 12, the heir to the throne, and Richard, 9, who would have been murdered on the orders of their uncle (and brother of Edouard IV), Richard.

William Shakespeare immortalized the latter in his play “Richard III”. However, describing him as a cunning hunchback who got rid of his nephews to seize the throne. Therefore, But the British author Philippa Langley this mystery reappears london – who contributed to the discovery of the body of Richard III in a parking lot in Leicester. Furthermore, in the center of England, in 2012 – is now advancing a new theory: the princes would have survived.

Philippa Langley in 2013, with a reconstruction of Richard III.Image: imago stock&people

She is convinced that. the hypothesis that Richard has murdered them is a version of the story “written by the winners”. An article published in 2015 on the occasion of the burial of Richard III to the cathedral of Leicester. which questioned the fact that one honors a “murderer of children”, increased his desire to go further.

“I have always had the impression that this story has developed during the reign of the Tudors,” she explains. Then was repeated “many times” until it becomes “an accepted truth as a fact”.

This mystery reappears london

An approach worthy of criminal surveys

Richard III reigned from 1483 to his brutal death at the battle of Bosworth. near Leicester, in 1485, at the age of 32. This battle marked the last major confrontation of the Deux-Roses war, which opposed two branches of the Plantagenêt house. She radically changed the course of English history: the Tudors dynasty. led by Henri VII, seized the throne at the expense of the Richard plantingnets.

For Philippa Langley. Henri VII, “an individual very, very intelligent, but deeply suspicious and paranoid”, this mystery reappears london is at the origin of the theory which made Richard the murderer of the princes.

Philippa Langley decided to revisit the affair of the princes of the Tower of London by adopting an approach worthy of modern criminal surveys. She asked for methodological advice from a group of specialists from the world of investigation, including police and lawyers. “They said to me:” If you don’t have a formally identified body, then this is a matter of disappearance. And you have to deal with the investigation as such “, says Philippa Langley.

When she called for the help of volunteers to explore the archives. she was overwhelmed with answers, simple citizens as medieval this mystery reappears london historians. This collective work has given birth to “Missing Princes Project” (the project of the disappeared princes). a ten-year project which, she says, has brought to light “many evidence” of the survival of princes.

Conclusions that divide

For Philippa Langley. Richard III detractors now demonstrate that the two young princes are indeed died in the London Tower. “We can no longer say that Richard III murdered them,” she said. At the heart of his conviction: recently exhumed documents reporting support for a rebellion in 1487 led by a. “son of Edouard IV”.

This rebellion is historically associated with Lambert Simnel. a pretender to the throne who was crowned in Dublin after the death of Richard III. However. according to the new sources brought to light by the team of this mystery reappears london Philippa Langley, Lambert Simnel was described as “son of King Edouard”. It would be, for the author, Prince Edouard, eldest son of Edouard IV.

Lambert Simnel illustrationImage: www.imago-images.de

But his conclusions divide. Michael Dobson, director of the Shakespeare Institute at the University of Birmingham, is skeptical.

Almost 550 years after the death of the princes. the mystery has not yet been resolved.

WhatsApp is experimenting with a new function intended to make group discussions clearer.