The director explains the scene that no one understood (not even him)

If you haven’t understood anything about this scene ofEvanouisthat’s normal: the director either.

Passed out is one of the flagship horror films of summer 2025, alongside Substitution and Together. Similarly, With the difference that the film by Zach Cregger. Furthermore, previously known to have signed Barbarousstands out from her little comrades by her very beautiful start to the box office.

The enthusiastic reception of the public. Consequently, the criticism is all the more a good surprise since this production carried by Julia Garner and Josh Brolin has something to confuse his audience, not only director explains scene no one by its strange and disturbing atmospherebut also by its enigmatic points of detail which remain unanswered at the end of the story. Furthermore, This is particularly the case with a particular image. However, which would ask for many explanations if the director had not just admitted that he has none to provide.

Finouis takes off weapons

The scene that probably questions the public the most passed outthis is the sequence of the dream in which the character of Josh Brolin follows his son disappeared in a silent journey Who leads him, at night, to a house.

Arrived in front of the building in which Matthew returns. In addition, director explains scene no one his father looks up and sees, above the roof, A giant assault rifle (which is almost the size of the house under it) float in the air and turn slowly on itself. Similarly, On its side is a light counter: 217. Therefore, A figure reminiscent of 2:17, the time when the children of the film all disappeared simultaneously. The amazing appearance is never re -mentioned in the rest of the film, and His meaning is never explained.

Fascinating mystery, intense frustration or completely clear symbol? Everyone will have to get their opinionaccording to what Zach Cregger himself declared to Variety After he was asked. what this scene meant:

“I don’t know. It is a very important film to me. and to be honest, I think that if I like it so much it is precisely because I do not understand it. I have some ideas of what he might mean, but I have no real response to bring.

I like to say that everyone will probably have their own reaction. their own relationship to this scene, that people have nothing to do with it and find it useless, or, on the contrary, that they see a kind of political words, or that they find it just cool. I don’t care, it’s not up to me to decide. I just like the fact that it is there. ”

The original title of the film is none other than Weaponswhich translates into French by “weapons”. Even if the word makes a priori reference to the characters bewitched director explains scene no one by the film antagonist. changed into human war machines, the image of an assault rifle between necessarily in resonance with the term.

You can see an innuendo on The violence of the military past of the character of Josh Brolin Who haunts him more than he wants to admit it (217 would it be the number of his victims?). Or an explicit parallel between the violence experienced by the characters (especially the children) and The omnipresence of firearms in the United States. Unless you detect something else quite different.

As Zach Cregger says. the appearance is mysterious enough for each spectator to be able to Find the reading that director explains scene no one will touch him the mosteven if it finds nothing interesting. It is the risk taken by the director who obviously chose. in this scene, to give priority to pure visual invention To express themselves, rather than a rational reflection. Genius or missed shot? To make your own opinion, you have to run to see Passed out, Released in theaters since August 6.