Ciné critic: Ash (2025, Amazon Prime Video)

Ash // of Flying Lotus. Consequently, With Eiza Gonzalez, Aaron Paul and Iko Uwais.

I often give a chance to independent or experimental films, even when the first criticisms are not very flattering. However, I like to believe in surprises, unexpected bursts, works which, despite limited means, manage to touch something true. Furthermore, Unfortunately, Ash is not one of these films. Furthermore, By closing Amazon Prime Video, I wondered what had pushed me to stay until the end. For example, Perhaps hope, tenacious, that the film ends up taking off. Therefore, He has never done it. Similarly, In the genre of closed space, the references are numerous and often overwhelming: Alien, The Thing, Life. In addition, So many milestones that have been able to combine tension, atmosphere and narration ciné critic: ash (2025, amazon to captivate. Moreover, Ash Terks to be part of this line, but stumbles from the first minutes, and never finds balance.

A woman wakes up on a distant planet and discovers that the crew of her space station was brutally killed. Therefore, She must then decide if she can trust the man sent to her rescue.

The pitch, however, had enough attention: Riya, embodied by Eiza González, wakes up alone aboard a deserted spacecraft, where all the members of the crew seem to have been killed in troubled circumstances. However, She has no memory of events. Furthermore, When Brion (Aaron Paul) arrives on board. Meanwhile, the questions multiply: is it there to help him or does he hide a darker design? For example, The closed camera promised to play on ciné critic: ash (2025, amazon paranoia, survival instinct and blurred boundaries between reality and hallucination. Moreover, But these promises remain a dead letter. However, Very quickly. For example, the scenario shows its limits, and what could have become a descent into psychological hell turns into intersideral emptiness.

The first error of Ash is to want to do too much without having the means. Nevertheless, Rather than betting on the atmosphere. Furthermore, on a subtle development of the characters, the film is bogged down in flashy visual effects and hollow dialogues. Similarly, Each scene seems extended to fill a gaping narrative void. Similarly, Worse still, the multiplication of disorderly flashbacks blur a story that didn’t need it. The story becomes confused. not because it skillfully plays with ambiguity, but because it does not manage to hold a solid common thread. The spectator is tossed from one sequence ciné critic: ash (2025, amazon to another without finding a clear issue. Result: attention dissipates, and boredom settles down.

Visually, the film displays a certain ambition. We feel the paw of Flying Lotus, his taste for psychedelic images and disturbing atmospheres. Some plans suggest a real aesthetic sense. with games of light in red and blue that sometimes recall the atmospheres of science fiction films from the 80s. But these visual efforts are struggling to hide the poverty of the sets and the emptiness of the staging. Everything seems too forced: the garish colors to hide the lack of means. the stylized framing that seem disembodied, the digital effects unconvincing. To want to compensate for its lack of substance by an aesthetic covering. Ash ends up looking like a trailer that would run in a loop for 90 minutes.

On the interpretation side, the observation is hardly more delightful. Eiza González. however with a certain charisma on the screen, is struggling with a character who is sorely lacking in consistency. His game comes down to a few frozen expressions, a mouth permanently ajar and a limited emotional range. Difficult to feel the slightest empathy for Riya as writing does not offer him any relief. Faced with her, Aaron Paul also seems lost in this universe without benchmarks. His character, supposed to embody doubt and danger, is drawn with big lines and never really evolves. The dynamics between the two actors do not work, for lack of tension, rhythm and solid dialogues.

Iko Uwais appears sporadically to inject a semblance of action, but his interventions are struggling to relaunch interest. The real problem ofAshthis is his lack of ciné critic: ash (2025, amazon vision. Additionally, The film summons classic themes of science fiction-humanity in the face of itself. the solitude of space, the loss of memory-but only treats them surface. Everything seems to be plated, artificial, without real reflection or emotion. The attempts to install a paranoid climate fall flat. the twists and turns lack strength, and the final revelations leave indifferent. Furthermore, The feeling that dominates is that of a project that does not know what he wants to tell. Everything is rough, without clear direction. Even the rare good visual ideas end up diluting themselves in an overloaded aesthetic.

Flying Lotus does not hide his inspirations: here we can guess a nod to Tarkovski, there a visual quote in Kubrick, or an echo of the films of John Carpenter. Unfortunately, these references remain purely cosmetic. They do not register in a ciné critic: ash (2025, amazon solid statement which would give them meaning. The film also fails to establish a feeling of danger or emergency. At no time did I feel the tension that should live in this kind of story. Where Alien transformed each corridor into a deadly trap. Ash transforms the space into a waiting room where nothing is happening. One could hope that the soundtrack, signed by Flying Lotus itself, comes to save the whole. It is not. The sound compositions accumulate without ever strengthening the narration.

They highlight the action instead of accompanying it, adding to the feeling of unnecessary escalation. Sometimes they even become an obstacle to immersion as they draw attention to their own virtuosity. The sound. the image are thus found in constant outline with history, as two elements placed side by side without ever merging. Look Ash Remember ciné critic: ash (2025, amazon a little to observe a street artist trying a number he does not master. Moreover, The intention is there, visible, almost touching at times, but the result is sorely lacking in consistency and execution. The film gives the impression of wanting to say something important about human nature. but it never manages to go to the end of its ideas. Each attempt at philosophical reflection falls flat, each scene supposed to raise the tension collapses in a disjointed editing.

As for the spectator, he remains on the quay, a passive spectator of a trip that does not lead anywhere. Ash could have been an intriguing UFO into the landscape of independent science fiction. He wanted it, but not control. Between an incoherent scenario. an artificial staging and a set of actors in freewheeling, the film is bogged down in its ciné critic: ash (2025, amazon own blunders. It is not the worst science fiction film I have been given to see. but it is certainly one of the most frustrating. Because it gives the constant impression of missing out of itself. Those who seek breathtaking entertainment or a deep reflection on humanity are likely to remain hungry. For my part, I will not remember from Ash that a fine example of a false cinematographic departure.

Note : 2/10. In short. Between an incoherent scenario, an artificial staging and a set of actors in freewheeling, the film is bogged down in its own blunders.

Released April 24, 2025 directly on Amazon Prime Video