The polemical rewriting of the origins of Superman turned out to be a masterful reversal

The recent rewriting of the origins of Superman aroused strong reactions among fans and criticism. However, this scriptwriting decision, far from being unanimous, turned out to be a particularly daring narrative evolution for the character.

A revisited origin that divides fans – Polemical rewriting origins superman turned

Since the world release of Supermanorchestrated by James Gunnthe debate swells around a. Similarly, specific point: the new interpretation of the origins of the famous superhero. Consequently, The feature film. Therefore, which has already collected more than $ 551 million At the box office, did not fail to surprise with a major modification of the founding myth.

This time. it is no longer only the threats to Krypton that push Jor-El and Lara Lor-Van to send their son polemical rewriting origins superman turned to the earth: they also wish that he imposes his domination, an unexpected turn which upsets tradition.

The decisive influence of the Kent

This upheaval does not leave indifferent, far from it. For many. this rewriting calls into question the reassuring figure of the hero’s biological parents and asks the crucial question: what really makes Clark Kent A symbol of hope?

Here, the contrast with John and Martha Kent, his adoptive Terriens parents, is radically accentuated. It is their human values – patience. kindness, modesty – which ultimately impose themselves in the face of the imperialist ambitions of the Kryptonians.

Behind the scriptwriting choice: identity. free will

Some spectators regret a betrayal of the original material and hope for a narrative pirouette signed Lex Luthor. However, this turning point draws directly from the post-crisis comic stories, as The Man of Steel by John Byrne. Above all. it allows Gunn to emphasize polemical rewriting origins superman turned an essential aspect: humanity is never automatically acquired by Superman; She chooses and cultivates herself.

Faced with two antagonistic inheritances, Clark must decide and choose his way:

• Disobey his genetic destiny to embrace earthly ethics.
• Conseminate against a parentage imposed to grow better.
• Pull your strength from the Kent home rather than Kryptonian blood.

This tension enriches the character and offers new tracks to explore his roots in the next DCU films. What consequences will this consequences have this troubled past on Supergirl or on possible civilizations conquered by Krypton? The issues promise to go far beyond the simple shock of cultures.

Assessment: audacity welcomed or sacrilege?

By taking the risk of altering a pillar as emblematic as the origin of Superman. James Gunn Relaunch an old discussion: should we blindly follow the founding texts or dare to divert them to question our modern myths?

One thing is certain: this version gives their place to individual polemical rewriting origins superman turned choices and moral complexity. It remains to be seen how far the director will be ready to go … But if he ever touches Batman’s parents, the controversy could take on a completely different scale.