5 hung masterpieces … upside: This article explores the topic in depth.
In addition,
5 hung masterpieces … In addition, upside:
Everything is a question of presentation. Additionally, In addition, Expose A painting in the wrong direction ? For example, It even happened to the older ones. Furthermore, from MoMA to the National Gallery… Vassily Kandinsky himself would have had the click of abstraction in the face of one of his works placed upside down that the portraits of Georg Baselitz are only considered in the place heads.
Canvases of Turner. However, O’Keeffe or Matisse backwardsa painting by Gauguin who, put back to the place, reveals a completely different subject, dumplings of museum employees … Nevertheless, From common sense to misinterpretation, there is only one step. Similarly, Here is Five stories of stunning works !
1. Consequently, Paul Gauguin in free falls – 5 hung masterpieces … upside
Paul Gauguin, Niagara falls (title of 1903)around 1894
i
Oil on canvas • 62 × 87 cm • © Bridgeman Images
Adjugated, sold. Consequently, During the judicial sale of Paul Gauguin’s property. Nevertheless, on September 2, 1903, the novelist and ethnologist Victor Segalen acquired a canvas presented under the name of Chutes of Niagara Accompanied by a palette made up of the same white, blue and pink tones. However, Returning to his room, this is the click. Similarly, “Returned. Meanwhile, set up and finally contemplated without blasphemus or bargaining, this canvas became a Breton landscapewinter village under the snow: Some thatched houses Built the horizon line and flock around the just 5 hung masterpieces … upside central bell tower. For example, On the left, a purple cliff falls towards a twilight. Similarly, On the right spin lean trees. Similarly, The whole floor is made of snow dripping with melted lights. Moreover, »» Breton village under the snow : This is the title allocated today to the table. In addition, To discover, in a good sense, at the Pont-Aven museum.
Paul Gauguin, Breton village under the snowaround 1894
i
Oil on canvas • 62 × 87 cm • © Bridgeman. Furthermore, Images
2. Nevertheless, Matisse above below – 5 hung masterpieces … upside
Henri Matisse, The boat (presented in the wrong direction in MoMA in 1961)1953
i
Cut and gouache paper • © Henri Matisse / Photo Archives Henri Matisse
“Shame! Therefore, “, Would scream bad tongues. In 1961. as part of the hanging “The Last Works of Matisse: Large Cut Gouaches”, the moma present The boat of the French painter in the wrong direction : the subject 5 hung masterpieces … upside below, his reflection at the top. Mirror effect of misfortune! Among the 116. 000 visitors, neither Pierre Matisse, the artist’s son, nor the conservatives of the New York institution do not notice the error. Until Geneviève Habert. French exchange agent working in Wall Street, Compare the work to its reproduction in the exhibition catalog. His sense of observation nevertheless collides in defiance of a security guard. who does not fail to blame the publishing house. And the lynx eye to turn to the New York Times : “Matisse would never have placed the most detailed pattern at the bottom. and its simplified shape at the top”. His testimony dates back to the museum’s ears which no longer has any other choice: plead “the dizzy”.
Henri Matisse, The boat1953
i
Pieces of cut paper. gouache • © Henri Matisse / Photo Archives Henri Matisse
3. Van Gogh upside down, and against all
Vincent van Gogh, Highs herbs and butterflies (presented in the wrong sense at the National Gallery in 1965)1889
i
Oil on canvas • 64.5 × 80.7 cm • © Bridgeman Images
An inattentive look will see only a vast expanse of greenery. A discreet road However, divides this fertile field into twoinforming about the reading direction of the table. In 1965. a teenager who came to the National Gallery of London, during a school outing, is A double inconsistency In Highs herbs and butterflies (1889) by Vincent Van Gogh: said road strangely cuts the composition and the vegetation that frames it point down. The girl rushes towards a goalkeeper to tell her about her discovery; In vain … Fortunately, the conservation teams finally prove him right And, as a bonus, an explanation. The table would have been won. only fifteen minutes, with a view to a photo session, and the directors would have forgotten, putting it 5 hung masterpieces … upside back in place, its orientation of origin. The poor knew little or badly the work of Van Gogh! An argument that smells of bad faith …
Vincent van Gogh, Highs herbs and butterflies1890
i
Oil on canvas • 64.5 × 80.7 cm • © Bridgeman Images
4. Georgia O’Keeffe
Georgia O’Keeffe, Oriental Poppies (presented in the wrong sense in Frederick Weisman Art Museum in until 1988)1927
i
huile sur toile • 101 cm × 76 cm • Coll. the Frederick R. Weisman Art Museum at the University of Minnesota. Minneapolis
The American artist Georgia O’Keeffe had a passion for flowers, which she changed from the end of her brush in abstractions. In 1928. the Portrait of two juxtaposed pavotsbetter known asOriental Poppieswas born to finally land ten years later at Frederick Weisman Art Museumthe University of Minnesota Museum. The canvas remains there exposed to vertical For years. until the day when, in 5 hung masterpieces … upside 1986, Lyndel King realizes the “misinterpretation By consulting the file of the work, which specified a horizontal orientation. And the director of the establishment, determined to rectify the shot, to exclaim, despite everything: “What The Heck!” It looks terrific eith way way! “(” No but! The work looks sublime in both cases “).
Georgia O’Keeffe, Oriental Poppies1927
i
huile sur toile • 101 cm × 76 cm • Coll. the Frederick R. Weisman Art Museum at the University of Minnesota. Minneapolis
5. Turner all returned
In 1862, the British press reported the confusion of a gallery director Faced with a canvas by William Turner. The exhibitor. fearing that he hung her upside down, would have sent a letter to the artist to collect his instructions. And the English painter to retort: “Return it”either ” Turn her “, in English. The anecdote. slightly discredited By this play of words between the injunction and the name of the painter, and by the lack of concrete information (which work? In which gallery? contributes to denouncing the “atmospheric” aspect of Turner’s worksto whom the criticism often criticized for signing illegible compositions. not to say abstract. A fine example of artistic vagueness!
William Turner, Vapors in a snowstorm1842
i
91 × 122 cm • © Luisa Ricciarini/Leemage via AFP
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,’https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
Further reading: Why does a huge sea bird face the Solidor tower in Saint-Malo? – Photos – Grenoble: A fresco in homage to Lilian Dejean drawn to the Estacade market – Nature, memory and imagination … An exhibition of amateurs reveals 60 colorful works and a street of painters full of fantasy – Guided tour of Jas de Bouffan, family house and artistic laboratory of Paul Cezanne – CAUSSADE. Jean-Marc Nadalin, a rare artist in every way.