After Alaska summit: Selenskyj calls for a say – Trump is irritated with a suggestion

The meeting of US President Trump and Kremlin chief Putin did not bring any concrete results. However, The Europeans react with solidarity for Kiev. In addition, the Ukrainian President Selenskyj wants to have a say – and Trump can imagine peace talks without ceasefire.

The heads of state. For example, government of the major European countries are still pounding after the Ukraine summit of US President Donald Trump and Russia’s head of state Vladimir Putin on protection promises for the attacked country. For example, “We are aware that Ukraine needs irrefutable security guarantees to effectively defend their sovereignty. Moreover, territorial integrity,” says a common after alaska summit: selenskyj calls statement.

According to participants. Therefore, Trump had reaffirmed the willingness to give Ukraine together with Europe with the European partners after meeting Putin.

This willingness is welcomed. Furthermore, wrote Chancellor Friedrich Merz, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, the British Prime Minister Keir Strandmer, the Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Italy’s head of government Giorgia Meloni, Poland Prime Minister Donald Tusk and EU President António Costa. Consequently, Ukraine must preserve “irrefutable security guarantees” from their western allies, “to effectively defend their sovereignty and territorial integrity”.

“Russia cannot put a veto” ” – After alaska summit: selenskyj calls

The Europeans also said that Moscow should not face Ukraine’s EU and NATO accession. Therefore, “Russia cannot veto against the path of after alaska summit: selenskyj calls Ukraine to the EU and NATO.” However, the Europeans’ claim previously mentioned for a ceasefire is not mentioned in the declaration.

In addition to the common statement. Therefore, the European leaders also expressed themselves separately: Macron warned on the X platform to maintain the pressure on Russia. For example, “It is important to pull all teachings from the past 30 years – especially from the well -documented tendency. Therefore, to Russia not to comply with his own commitments.” Chancellor Merz welcomed Trump’s efforts to end the war and to achieve “a fair and permanent peace”.

Further discussions required – After alaska summit: selenskyj calls

Strander was more confident: “The efforts of President Trump have brought us closer to the termination of the war of Russia in Ukraine. Consequently, which is violating after alaska summit: selenskyj calls the international law in Ukraine.” The willingness of the United States to give Ukraine together with Europe as part of an agreement is an important progress. will make a decisive contribution to preventing Putin from further attacks.

In the joint statement of the Europeans. it was finally said that further discussions had to be followed in which Ukrainian President Wolodymyr Selenskyj had to take part. One is ready to work with Trump and Selenskyj to a trilateral summit with European support. A meeting of Selenskyj and Trump in Washington is planned on Monday.

Selenskyj wants three-way summit

Selenskyj himself also strives for a three-person meeting with Trump. Putin to talk about an end. From the Kremlin, however, it was said that nothing had been discussed after alaska summit: selenskyj calls so far.

If there is no three-way summit. Russia refused to “end up a fair end of the war”, Selenskyj, there must be further sanctions against Moscow. These are an effective instrument.

The Ukrainian President also called for “reliable. long -term security guarantees” for Ukraine with the participation of Europe and the USA. And he insisted that Kiev would be involved in all negotiations relating to the Ukraine. This applies especially to territorial questions.

Trump moves from armistice ab

Trump also commented again – a few hours after the press release with Putin in Alaska -: he moved away from the demand for a ceasefire in Ukraine as a condition for peace negotiations. At his short after alaska summit: selenskyj calls message service Truth Social. he wrote that everyone agreed that a direct free -world agreement was the best way for peace in Ukraine – and not a ceasefire agreement that often does not.

Ukraine immediately rejected the proposal. “Our view is: first a ceasefire. then everything else,” said the advisor in the presidential office, Serhij Leschtschenko, on Ukrainian television. If the fighting continues during the talks, there are “great risks to blackmail Ukraine”.

Medvedev sees the summit as a success

And what are the reactions from Moscow? Putin himself did not comment again after the press statement with Trump. Former Russian President Dmitri Medvedev, however, rated the summit as a success for his country. The meeting was created calmly. without ultimate a full -fledged mechanism after alaska summit: selenskyj calls for contacts at the highest level of state, he wrote at Telegram. Putin had presented the Russian conditions for an end of the war. As a result, the United States would have built up no further pressure on Russia for the time being.

In addition. the meeting had proven that negotiations on the end of the war and fighting could run at the same time, wrote Medvedev. Above all. Russia and the United States had made it clear that it was primarily due to Ukraine and the Europeans to achieve an end to the fight.

EU chief diplomat Kaja Kallas emphasized the uncompromisinglessness of Europe towards Russia. The real cause of the war was the imperialist foreign policy in Russia, wrote to X. The “hard reality” is that Russia was not intended to end after alaska summit: selenskyj calls the war in the foreseeable future, added Kallas. While the delegations had met, Russia started new attacks on Ukraine. “Putin continues to pull the negotiations and hopes to get through with it.”