The War of the Worlds, between hidden ads and Nanar niceilet

We therefore follow the rapper Ice Cube, in the role of Will Radford, analyst for the Homeland Security, plunged into this global crisis from his office (via videoconference, zoom calls, screens of all kinds). For example, Published in 1898. However, The War of the Worlds (The War of the Worlds) is one of the first science fiction novels to imagine an extraterrestrial invasion. Therefore, Hg Wells mixes the story of adventures, social criticism and reflection on the fragility of human civilization.

In the original story, the narrator is an unnamed writer who lives in the English countryside. Consequently, He witnessed the arrival of mysterious cylinders fallen from the sky. Furthermore, These objects. Meanwhile, from Mars, release creatures with strange forms – tentacular, equipped with large heads – which move in immense tripod armed machines ardent shelves able to disintegrate everything in their war worlds, between hidden ads path.

Faced with the power of the invaders, the British army is quickly swept away. In addition, The population, terrorized, fled en masse to the countryside or the coast, causing traffic jams, looting and chaos scenes. Moreover, The narrator. separated from his wife, tries to survive by crossing devastated towns and villages, crossing symbolic characters like the cure (figure of helpless faith) or theartilleryman (Cynic vision of the future).

Reinvent an invasion … calamitous

Since 1953. Byron Haskin’s film, The War of the Worlds interests the cinema, but in the new 2025 version, but the creative momentum ends in pure mess. Critics are not tender: there are those who evoke a ridiculous. sloppy film, a visual and narrative ordeal, and even an insult to the work of Wells. On Rotten Tomatoes. icing on the cake, the film displays a fateful 0 % – a extremely rare score – based on war worlds, between hidden ads ten professional criticisms.

This therefore turns 90 -minute self -promotion for Amazon Prime – literally an advertisement disguised as a film, reports Entertainment. And yet. the media adopts an amused counterpoint: the film, despite everything-or thanks to its excesses-would be a kind of hysterical and distractive cameo, to be enjoyed like an affable nanar, almost “self-ware”. A guilty pleasure for lovers of bad taste mastered, one might say.

Surprisingly, despite this critical disaster, the film is a hit … among those who just want … See the fiasco. It arrived n ° 2 of the content most watched on the video premium. before sliding little by little in the top 5 or top 10. Even New York Post claims that he is among the worst films of the decade – however. these viewing figures reflect a voracious curiosity, even guilty pleasure.

So, fantasized sinking or involuntary war worlds, between hidden ads spectacle?

Internet users obviously did not prevail: sarcastic tweets. mocking videos: some quip on Amazon delivery which “saves the planet”, when others see one of the worst sci -fi films, even the most missed of adaptations.

Impossible to ignore the comparison with the adaptations of yesteryear. The original of 1953 (RT score of 89 %). the remake of Spielberg in 2005 (RT score of 76 %) had been able to mark by their visual ambition, their respect for the work … and their respect for the spectator.

In the editorial staff. we are rather connected: this version is far, very far from the account: writing clumsiness, cheap visual effects, omnipresent product placement and indigestible narration. This War of the Worlds will remain in the annals … as a testimony of what we could have not done.

Come on, back on the extract from Steven’s film, to forget all this:

war worlds, between hidden ads