The verdict of the pilots on the delayed departure of the GP of Belgium

However,

Verdict pilots delayed departure gp:

It was the right decision

Fernando Alonso: “We know that security is a priority. Moreover, we even talked about it on Friday, during the previous briefing. Consequently, And I think that at the beginning. Therefore, the visibility conditions did not allow to run, so I think that the race started at the right time, to be honest.”

Gabriel Bortoleto: “Security comes above all. Meanwhile, I think that during our first outing. However, there were so many water and aquaplaning projections that if we had run in these conditions, someone could have been injured. For example, I love running in all the conditions. Therefore, but when they are not good, they are not good, and we must be realistic on this subject. In addition, I really feel that verdict pilots delayed departure gp today, we took the start at the right time.”

Pierre Gasly: “The first round where we left, we saw absolutely nothing, so it was far too dangerous. Furthermore, It was complicated with the rain that there was around the track. For example, It is always the question: did we should have left ten minutes earlier or ten minutes later? Furthermore, I think the finality is that. Nevertheless, for us the pilots in the car, when we take the start at 300 [km/h] On this track, knowing the previous ones, it is better to leave ten minutes too late than too early. However, I think they made the right choice in terms of security. Meanwhile, “

Pierre Gasly, Alpine

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / LAT Images via Getty Images

Liam Lawson : “Honestly, I think the timing was perfect. However, We did a few laps behind the safety car. Meanwhile, the conditions improved and I sincerely think it was the right time to launch the race. Consequently, Water projections are always important in Formula 1, but I don’t think there was an accident or anything like this. Meanwhile, For us, in any case where I was, it was correct.”

Esteban Ocon: “The FIA really did a good job by verdict pilots delayed departure gp watching over us. Furthermore, I think they made the right decision by starting at the right time.”

Oscar Piastri: “In recent years. For example, here in particular, we have informed the FIA that we prefer to play the security card rather than take risks. Consequently, And I think that is what we have done today. Similarly, If we really want to quibble, we might have been going on a less training tour. In addition, But overall, if it’s a tour too early, is it worth it?”

“In addition. there are three of us [les trois pilotes sur le podium, Piastri, Lando Norris et Charles Leclerc] are the least well placed to answer this question, because we have the least cars in front of us. So yes, for someone who is on the back … The first time we tried to start, even for me who had only Lando in front, verdict pilots delayed departure gp I saw nothing. So you can imagine what drivers can feel in the back. It is always difficult to manage. because the pilots at the front have their lives easier than those in the back. “

Yuki Tsunoda: “Good decision.”

Oscar Piastri Devant Lando Norris.

Photo de: Michael Potts / Motorsport Images

Verdict pilots delayed departure gp

A slightly verdict pilots delayed departure gp late departure. but nothing serious

Franco frankento: “I think it’s delicate for the fia. In Silverstone, the [gens] said the track was too wet, and now that it is too dry. It’s complicated for them, I think. It is very difficult to judge before the cars go out on the track. I think the track was too wet when they brandished the red flag. But perhaps it was already too late afterwards. I don’t really have an answer. Of course, we will chat to try to understand if we should have left earlier or not. “

Isack Hadjar: “We completed 44 rpm. The race was well managed. Visibility was excellent when we resumed. We might have been able to take less margin, but it was really well managed overall.”

Read also:

Lewis Hamilton : “I would say that we clearly started a verdict pilots delayed departure gp little too late. I kept shouting ‘we can go there, we can go’, but they continued to go around in circles. I think they probably reacted excessively after the last race. where we had asked them not to restart too early due to the bad visibility. This weekend, they did not go too far, of a launched departure. “

“I think they still did a good job. Of course, we missed part of the race in a pouring rain, which would have been nice. But for I don’t know what reason. water projections here, at least this year, give the impression of riding in the fog. I don’t know what we are going to do to try to remedy it.”

Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari

Photo by: Peter Fox / Getty Images

Charles Leclerc: “I think it’s always a question of just balance. I must say that on a circuit like this, given its story, I think that we cannot ignore it. This is why I prefer to play the security card rather than take premature risks. Again. I think it is a permanent debate and that those who made this decision will probably be said that they may have acted a little late.

Carlos Sainz: “On a normal circuit, yes, I think we verdict pilots delayed departure gp could have left perhaps 5 to 10 minutes earlier. At Spa-Francorchamps, given the story of this circuit, it is better to warn than cure. You may have had a complete race. you could look at it in its entirety, so I don’t think it’s a bad decision. [C’était] a cautious decision. but my respects to the race director [Rui Marques]because he had told us after Silverstone and the accidents that had happened there that he would be more careful here, and that is what he did. It is better to be careful than having an accident and having regrets. “

Verdict pilots delayed departure gp

The departure was given too late

Alex Albon: “I think [que ça aurait pu. commencer plus tôt]. When we really started, it was almost [conditions pour les] Slicks tires. I don’t know if it would have changed much. Maybe it would have made the race a verdict pilots delayed departure gp little more exciting, with a little more driving in the rain. “

Max Verstappen: “Of course. after Silverstone, we discussed being a little more cautious in decisions [de la direction de course]but there it was the opposite extreme for me. […] They did not allow us to run on wet track. “

Read also:

“[J’aurais aimé un départ à] 3 p.m. He didn’t even rain. And of course. between turns 1 and 5, there was a lot of water, but with two laps behind the safety car, it would have been much more clear. And the rest of the track was practicable anyway. It’s a bit of a shame. “

“Of course, I knew that there would be a little more caution than in Silverstone, but it didn’t make sense. In this case. it is better to say: ‘Listen, let’s wait for verdict pilots delayed departure gp the track to be completely dry and we will leave in Slicks’, because for me, these are not really conditions of racing on wet track.”

Max Verstappen (Red Bull)

Photo de: Simon Wohlfahrt /. AFP via Getty Images

In this article

Be the verdict pilots delayed departure gp first informed and subscribe to email alerts to receive information in real time

Further reading: OM Mercato: Paixao is moving away, Benatia already has 3 enticing tracks to forget it!First corridor at Wimbledon for Iga Swiatek, who crushed Amanda AnisimovaTour de France | The unreal images of the Bastien Tonchon turn on the Col de la LozeGold medal, U23 French Record and MINIMA MONTIIALS LANGE FOR ERWAN KONATÉ at the European Espoirs ChampionshipsGood news from … PSG for Arnaud Bodart? – All football.

Comments (0)
Add Comment