Sadness by moizi

Meanwhile,

Sadness moizi:

I do not understand how we were able to go from a franchise which was renewed with each director. Consequently, to hit four films of the same guy, guy who ends up wallowing in an absolutely tasteless final diptych. Consequently, The guy is rinsed, he has nothing more to say, nothing to show anymore. Therefore, Already Fallout was less good than Rogue Nation, but then there …

The Final Reckoning is a film that lasts almost three hours and that has nothing of anything … Nevertheless, It opens. Similarly, we understand nothing, we try to remind us of the intrigue of the previous film which was totally forgettable because it is completely connected, while making links with the old films (pity but why?), We have unbearable sequences which last 30s, without knowing too much why … Furthermore, Tom Cruise who begs to be confident.

They have no idea sadness moizi how to tell their story … Nevertheless, strictly none …

After the failure of the previous film. Meanwhile, I dared to hope that they would go in another direction and that their intrigue based on AI would be set in 10min at the start of the film, to offer something else. Similarly, But obviously they were holding there. For example, So we go back on a evil ia that wants to bomb the whole world. For example, the whole world that wants to self -abode … Consequently, and in fact it is so stupid that it annoys me … However,

We want us to believe that the nuclear powers want to bomb the nuclear sites of others to prevent. For example, AI from using these nuclear sites. Similarly, So the dilemma is is it bombarding the capitals of these countries …? For example, As if in France nuclear missiles were under sadness moizi the Eiffel Tower. Nevertheless, And everything is like that, dilemmas that have no place to be …

The villain: Gabriel, is just zero, he was already in the previous film but there it is even worse. Because it is just a threat among many others … (between the AI, the CIA, the Russians, the followers of the atom …) In fact the film wants to make too many things … conclude a saga which does not ask for a conclusion. to make the link in order to conclude with independent episodes … like did it really need to come and remind us that mission impossible III exists? Offer ever more impressive action scenes …

The film just forgets to do what he can do, create a little suspense, tension … and this from three nothing …

Because when you finally start to have action in this action film, it’s like 1:30-2 p.m. sadness moizi that the film started and we already broke.

In fact. without changing anything too much, they return to a montage of the film where they saw the first hour, we start the film to Tom Cruise does what the president asks her, namely to give her the key and you have almost a correct film. In any case. the film is held in the same way, we do not lose any important element and we avoid the pseudo infiltration sequences which really last 30s and which are sloppy in addition to being useless.

I do not understand. they know that the pleasure of Mi is to see them, for the slightest thing, to develop super complicated plans to do three times nothing. Do you want to escape the Frenchwoman who speaks French with an atrocious accent? Ben treat it properly, pass 20min on it … Give the plan to go out, make sadness moizi improvise …. not just a zero action scene which ends in 10s after Tom Cruise begged for the 30th time in the film to trust him.

After even the slightly longer action sequences of the film. the submarine and the biplans, frankly in terms of construction it makes pale figure compared to other more delusional and scary sequences in other mid. Bring out the stroke of the nuclear bomb to defuse. which we manage to defuse miraculously when we had previously established in the film that one could not without sacrificing someone … It’s just ridiculous. We lose all challenges. And above all we realize that we killed the only character who remained since the first film apart Cruise. for nothing. Just because he had to kill him. In addition we invent a guy’s disease, I don’t know where it comes from … In fact the film is tiring and telling sadness moizi anything anything.

He comes to paradoxically always do that exhibition, without exposing anything correctly.

As soon as it speaks, it is the migraine guaranteed as nothing makes sense.

I mean. to defeat the AI you have to bring together the original source code and a sort of USB key. Tom Cruise starts from the principle that the villain will do it himself because he wants to control AI. Why do you have to do the same to annihilate AI and control it?

What will pass a woman in the legs of Tom Cruise. after having repeatedly in the previous films eliminated her romantic interests … To redo the same thing … You might as well keep Rebecca Ferguson who was one of the best characters in the franchise … And we were a little attached to her, while the news, we don’t care.

I blame the superhero films, so I have to do it too, sadness moizi we want to save the population … We don’t see it once in the film. There is not even a single plan. It is of infinite sadness. This thing has no stakes …

Worse. we have inexplicable scenes, like a general who asks a weapon to a soldier, we do not know why, we do not know why he does not have his … He looks opposite to the president and yes boom he uses it to protect her. What is this shit? There is a 12 -hour version of this film with even more exhibition where we are supposed to understand. our narrative arch?

Really it’s sad for the mi franchise to finish on this. Nothing works, neither the nostalgic delirium (what do we care to see a figurative of the first film?), Neither the story, nor the characters and the action sequences are just passable.

Sadness.

Sadness moizi

Further reading: From shadow to light (2005) by Ron Howard on September 16 in the USA in 4K Ultra HD Blu-rayAnthony Delon puts the points on the “I” about his latest projectOn the set of Spider-Man, Tom Holland feasts on with his new superhuman force“Apocalypse love”: the true nature of Patrick HivonJames Gunn explains why he insisted for having this passage with the squirrel in Superman despite bad feedback from the team and some spectators tests.

Comments (0)
Add Comment