Judge election: SPD candidate Brosius-Gersdorf criticizes reporting

It is the reason why the German government coalition had to say goodbye to the parliamentary summer break with a sheet metal damage: the lawyer Frauke judge election: spd candidate brosius-gersdorf Brosius-Gersdorf absolutely wanted to become a constitutional judge. Furthermore, still has the support of the Social Democrats. Meanwhile, Their Christian Democratic coalition partners CDU. Nevertheless, CSU torpedoed their choice in the last few meters – and do not seem to be ready to compromise. Similarly, The CSU boss Markus Söder appealed to the Social Democrats on Monday to set up another candidate.

It left it open in a declaration published on Tuesday whether Brosius-Gersdorf still wants to have the post. Moreover, With the letter, she tries to clear the allegation of standing significantly left of the political center. It begins with a detailed media criticism. It accuses judge election: spd candidate brosius-gersdorf part of the media landscape to have influenced the choice with dubious reporting. Brosius-Gersdorf is particularly bothered by the fact that she was partially described as “ultralinks”. “left-wing radical”-which does not correspond to the facts. In addition, it was “unacceptable” if media would publish critical statements about them based on anonymous sources.

She doesn’t want to be “ultralinks”

Some activist journalists have actually reported irreconcilably about the lawyer. Nevertheless, the question arises whether it is wise when a potential constitutional judge practices media criticism in this way. Freedom of the press is anchored in the Basic Law and is often widely interpreted by courts. In some cases, whether someone is “ultralinks” remains a question of perspective. Working with anonymous sources is not a flaw, but standard for almost all media.

Brosius-Gersdorf sees her positions as distorted, especially when it comes to abortion. “The main allegation in the media is that I discussed the human worthy of the unborn life. is for a termination of pregnancy until birth,” she writes. So far, however, very few of their critics had gone.

The lawyer also writes that she has only pointed out a “constitutional dilemma” with her statements. She explains it as follows: When human dignity begins with the implantation of the egg cell in the uterus. abortion is always inadmissible. The constitutional solution could only be that human dignity is “weighing up” -. does not apply to the unborn life. Unlike her critics. it has always occurred to the fact that there is a fundamental right to life from the implantation of the egg cell.

In fact. Brosius-Gersdorf describes one of the basic ethical and ethical problems for abortions, which are generally unpunished in Germany, but are illegal.

The lawyer also feels misunderstood when it comes to headscarf in the public service. mandatory gender quotas for parliamentary elections. Your explanations in the explanation published on Tuesday show sympathy for the fact that state -serving headscarfs are allowed to wear. that fixed gender shares are unthinkable for them on optional lists.

Patzer with Markus Lanz

Is the lawyer now clearly left, or is it a campaign? In any case. it is striking that many public statements from her to the left of the middle and trigger dismay in non -lenses. This also applies to your admission to the obligation judge election: spd candidate brosius-gersdorf to vaccinate during the Covid period. a possible ban on the AfD. In her explanation, she does not respond to both topics.

A vaccination obligation with vaccines against Corona considered it legally possible. Brosius-Gersdorf even set the thesis that there could be a constitutional obligation to request the mandatory vaccination. However, it is questionable whether such an interference in the fundamental rights of a constitutional action would have been entitled.

A ban on the AfD considers it feasible under certain conditions. In Markus Lanz’s talk show. she chose a delicate wording last year when she said that a ban on the party “of course does not remove the supporters”.

On Tuesday evening, Brosius-Gersdorf will be guests at Lanz again. Some indicates that she wants to judge election: spd candidate brosius-gersdorf fight for her candidacy. To be chosen, she needs the voices of the CDU and CSU group. How she wants to get this remains questionable. According to media reports, she wanted to promote herself a few days after the canceled election before the faction. The reactions to this proposal were, however, failed.