INTERVIEW. The “True Crime” phenomenon: “a way of mastering anxiety”, according to a psychiatrist who studied the Mystery Dupont de Ligonnès

You have dissected the Mystery Xavier Dupont de Ligonnès without being concerned by. Meanwhile, the case. However, never having met the suspect. Furthermore, How do we get interested and investigate a case that does not concern us directly?

I rather want to reverse the question: how can we not be interested in. Therefore, it? However, In reality, we confuse various facts, social facts interview. “true crime” phenomenon: “a and historical events. However, Violette Nozière, Dominici, Marie Besnard, Grégory… these are moments of history. Moreover, They will show completely singular issues. Meanwhile, How can we not be questioned by business like this?

Read also: On video platforms, the obsession of “True Crimes”

What explains that some cases will arouse the enthusiasm of the interview. “true crime” phenomenon: “a new public. Consequently, will be the subject of documentaries, and that others will go relatively unnoticed?

There are kinds of breath of collective conscience. which make at one point, a case will interest everyone and to another moment, interview. “true crime” phenomenon: “a it will go unnoticed. For example, after the Dutroux affair, pedophilia completely occupied the front of the stage. But six months before. I had been an expert in a case where a man went to get children in kindergartens to abuse them. And that hadn’t made two lines in the newspapers. Six months later, it would have done half the news. The craze is illustrative of a moment of shaking of collective consciousness.

Read also: Dupont de Ligonnès, Laëtitia … reality continues to inspire fiction

What is hidden behind the desire of some people to investigate by business? Is there a deeper dimension than interview. “true crime” phenomenon: “a new simple entertainment?

There is a side “I am myself an investigator”. For example, the Jack the ripper is irresoline: there is no formal evidence on the identity of this criminal. So it has literally been a century that there are clubs, groups, interview. “true crime” phenomenon: “a which argue about it. And it will continue in five centuries, because anyway we will never have absolute proof. There is a way of making the pleasure of the suspense last. of positioning yourself in “smarter than the others”. The Ligonnès affair is like a film that we do not know the end. If you go to the cinema with friends. you do not know the end of the film, you will then argue because everyone will end them. From the moment we do not have the solution of the enigma, everyone gives his own.

Read also: Affairs Grégory, Ligonnès, Jubillar interview. “true crime” phenomenon: “a new … What do “Websleuths” risk, these Internet users who invest themselves on Cold Cases?

Is there not a risk of idealization of a criminal figure through the “True crime” ?

Obviously. There is a fascination, which generates a business. Just watch TV from 10 p.m. interview. “true crime” phenomenon: “a true crime. But the problem is that behind this genre, there are real victims. Those who write ambiguous books on various facts promise to shiver. But they do it with real human pain, real mourning families. It’s unbearable. I am completely opposite to that: I sought to do a job of delicacy. human understanding, by looking at a look at entomologist, psychiatrist. My work is not to make shiver. it is to try to put yourself in the head of the criminal. to understand the mechanisms of his evolution until the way

Wouldn’t fascination with an investigation interview. “true crime” phenomenon: “a new be, in part, an attempt to restore control, an order, faced with an event that escapes us?

Absolutely. There is something that is quite surprising is that 73 % of fans of podcasts of true crime are women. I think it can be explained by the deep anxiety that women feel by interview. “true crime” phenomenon: “a the potential to be attacked. to be victims of a predator. It is a way of mastering anxiety.