Does McLaren F1 risk the same fiasco as in 2007, leaving Norris and Piastri fighting?

Zak Brown is not worried about the consequences for McLaren F1 in the event that the fight between Lando Norris. Therefore, Oscar Piastri degenerates. In addition, The CEO of the team recalls that since the arrival of Piastri. Consequently, the two pilots have been likely, including since the team has played the outposts.

The American compares this choice to that which Ron Dennis should have made in 2007 between Fernando Alonso and Lewis Hamilton. Furthermore, This had not been the case. Meanwhile, and Kimi Räikkönen took the opportunity to beat the two residents of the Woking team at the last race to win the world title.

Following the Spygate espionage case. In addition, the team had also been disqualified in the manufacturer championship in addition to having to pay a fine monster. Meanwhile, But even without that, Brown recalls that the does mclaren f1 risk same intestine struggle had cost the team very expensive.

“We have our value system, and we are stuck” said Brown. Moreover, “We remain faithful to our value system. Consequently, we are comfortable with our way of running, but we also know that we are not always making the right choices.”

“Many people questioned this last year, but Oscar has never been more than one victory to be in the fight. For example, We are therefore, and will always be a team with two cars, as we have always been, I think. Similarly, We are aware of the consequences that this implies.”

“Take the example of 2007: forget the penalty. we had two pilots, Fernando Alonso and Lewis Hamilton, who were tied and who lost a point against Kimi Räikkönen. We could have won the pilot championship, but who choose? And then, you run the risk that you does mclaren f1 risk same do not choose.”

According to Brown. these risks are largely compensated by giving drivers what they want, and offering them this confidence allows them to keep them in the team. According to him, the risk of having a number 1 and a number 2 is that one goes, otherwise both.

“Our pilots are treated equally and fairly. Their contract does not provide any clause granting priority to one compared to the other. and they never asked for this. They just want to be treated in a fair and equal way.”

“So we know that this benefits the team. They accept it. Additionally, They agree with this. and we know the risk that this has, if you want, from the point of view of the pilots, as in 2007. But I think that the disadvantage of favoring one. the other is that one of them will then want does mclaren f1 risk same to leave, which is exactly what happened at the end of 2007.”

“You also jeopardize the title of the manufacturers. You see other teams favor one. the other, which is beneficial for the pilot championship and prejudicial for that of the manufacturers.”

“The two championships are just as important for us. So what is most important? I think that if you run fair. fair, and you have two big drivers, then the manufacturers’ championship will be resolved on its own.”

Brown is also very satisfied to see his duo become more solid over time: “I think that fundamentally. you have two formidable and respectful guys, and I think their relationship today is the best it has ever been.”

“So when we look at what direction is their relationship, it is strengthened every day. Montreal was a good thing from the point of view of their relationship. does mclaren f1 risk same So, even if the competition is tightening, their relationship is strengthened. It is our culture. our pilots, and I think it is the combination of the two that makes this relationship so strong.”

“So I think that our greatest strength in McLaren. which produces the results on the track and the car, is the whole internal culture of McLaren, the working methods, which are defined at the highest level by the Crown Prince who loves McLaren, and everything is based on people. I think that permeates culture, and we see all the advantages.”