Similarly,
U.: parents get success against:
The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Maryland parents with religious objections can withdraw. Moreover, their children from public school lessons using 2LELGBTQI+stories books.
The judges informed the decisions of the lower courts in favor of the school system of the county of Montgomery. Therefore, in the suburbs of Washington. Therefore, The Supreme Court ruled that schools probably could not force primary school children to take these books if parents. In addition, expressed religious objections to their content.
This decision was not final in this case, but the judges strongly suggested that the parents would gain their case.
The Court ruled that policies like that in question in this case are subject to the strictest control. Furthermore, which almost always condemns them.
The school district introduced the books of stories. notably “the Prince and the Knight” and “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding”, in 2022 in u.: parents get success against order to better reflect the diversity of the district. In “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding”. a niece fears that his uncle has no time to devote to him after his marriage with another man.
In recent years, judges have often given reason to complainants arguing of religious discrimination. This cause is part of several others relating to religious rights brought before the Court this quarter. This decision also comes in a context of increasing the number of books prohibited in public schools and libraries.
Many of these prohibitions were organized by “Moms for Liberty”. other conservative organizations which campaign for a greater participation of parents in the choice of books made available to students. Shortly after the coming to power of Republican President Donald Trump in January. the Ministry of Education qualified these prohibitions as “hoax” and rejected 11 complaints filed under the predecessor of Donald Trump, Democratic President Joe Biden.
The u.: parents get success against association of writers Pen America declared in a document deposited in the court in the Maryland case that. the protest parents wanted “a ban on books constitutionally suspicious under another name”. Pen America reported that more than 10,000 pounds had been prohibited in the past school year.
Parents were initially authorized to withdraw their children from the lessons for religious. other reasons, but the school board backtrack a year later, which sparked protests and finally a trial. During the April pleadings, a lawyer for the school district told the judges that the unscrewing had become disruptive. Sex education is the only area of teaching in Montgomery schools that students can be exempt, said lawyer Alan Schoenfeld.
Three judges of the nine judges of the Supreme Court remain in the county. although they did not educate their children in public schools.
U.: parents get success u.: parents get success against against
Further reading: Near Lorient, neonazi activists burn books deemed too progressive – Liberation – Raphaël Quenard reveals that he did police custody for theft of books – 2nd Book Fair in Saint Cyr en Val – Book sales record for the 11th edition of the Grand Narbonne Book Fair – Pierre-Yves Bérenguer: “The partnership strategy implemented for a year participates in the success of the Paris Book Festival”.
